Chicago IT Support and Consulting


Switchfast Blog: The Future of IT

Microsoft's Arc Touch Mouse: Productivity Booster or Bummer?

Wednesday, August 18, 2010 by Bryan Anderson

Nothing beats a classic keyboard and mouse setup for desktop computers, but the birth of alternative input devices like Apple's newest Magic Trackpad has given desktop users a choice between classical setups and new technology. User experience and feedback has proven a need for faster input methods and seamless interaction with evolving interfaces. While Apple's multi-touch technology flourishes, Microsoft appears to be preparing its own multi-touch device to compete in the market for integrated input devices.

The Arc Touch mouse, a product yet to be announced officially, offers the look and customized feel of a mouse while providing a "touch" part that allows touch-based scrolling instead of using a physical scroll wheel. While Apple's device comes in one shape and structure (flat), Microsoft's entry retains the ability to "curve for comfort," meaning a mouse experience for those of traditional input techniques and a touchpad experience for the more progressive types.

According to a DailyTech.com article, the glossy item "still relies on RF technology and a USB 'nano transceiver' for connectivity instead of Bluetooth". The author also points out that the flattened device makes it "easier to transport".

From Engadget.com, the mouse "features touch scrolling, a battery indicator, the ability to track on most any surface, and a transceiver that no doubt plugs into your laptop's USB port".

The technology is certainly nothing new to consumers - touch screen phones, monitors, and selective screens are taking over traditional physical input peripherals like the keyboard and mouse. The movement to mobile has cut down the practicality of using a separate input device. The transition to touchpad technology can be attributed to laptop and smartphone technology usage, as consumers get more comfortable with touch-scrolling instead of click-scrolling.

But does this "futuristic" input method increase productivity within a workplace? Mixing new technology with existing users can be difficult, but if the process improves these aspects this new device could be a worthwhile investment for improved efficiency:

Comfort. Going through day to day tasks, some may overlook comfort. In reality, a traditional mouse is not a one-size-fits-all. While one user may benefit from the size and build of a traditional desktop mouse, others choose a contoured fix to holding or using a mouse.

Intuitive. Touch-based data input can reduce physical stress on fingers and hands as the total force decreases due to the advanced technology. A physical scroll-wheel can be awkwardly placed, forcing users out of their comfort level, thus making the motion a burden more than a benefit.

Easy to Adapt. Like the smartphone market, certain companies will continue to provide physical keyboards with smartphones while others will dive all-in with touchscreen technology. In a sense, the Arc Touch will unravel the same way with desktop data input - not all users will intuitively understand a touchpad. Some of the common complaints are touch sensitivity or lack of beneficial proof. While the former is a hardware feature, the latter may not hold true if data input sees a major improvement with touchpad technology integrated in desktop environments.

 

Until next time -

Matthew Hymel

 

Switchfast Technologies
Chicago IT Support & Consulting
Rochester IT Support & Consulting

Related posts

0 comment(s) for “Microsoft Arc Touch Mouse – Productivity Booster or Bummer?”

    Leave comment:

    Name:  
    Email:  
    Website:
    Comment:  




    Archives