Chicago IT Support and Consulting

Switchfast Blog: The Future of IT

Gmail vs. Exchange – Will Cloud Services Cut Costs?

Wednesday, April 28, 2010 by Bryan Anderson

Contact Switchfast for a free quote to migrate to a hosted e-mail solution!

While larger corporations have relied on Microsoft products as their go-to infrastructure, they are beginning to consider other options to cut costs. One of these possible routes is moving an in-house e-mail structure to a cloud location, specifically the system that is being used and adopted by many consumers and small businesses: Gmail.

Now that Google has a strong presence in the consumer industry, their focus is the enterprise industry, which includes small businesses and large companies with thousands of employees. Either way, how can you be sure that the movement from a self-monitored infrastructure to an online business tool can cut costs?

In a lengthy article over at computerworld.com, there are many factors a company should consider before exiting Exchange. Let's go over some important issues for SMBs to think about:

On-premise vs. Off-premise.  As the article points out, "moving to the cloud, generally speaking, relieves IT of the responsibility of maintaining and operating an e-mail infrastructure, as well as allow developers to roll out new features as soon as they're ready." However, if you are heavily rooted in an on-premise Exchange environment, the cost of transferring may not cover the intended savings. Also, in a small business environment, is it important to have immediate assistance to a down e-mail system? Both Microsoft and Google claim a 99.9% Guaranteed uptime, but you sacrifice control with off-premise.

Re-education. Some businesses have attempted to switch over to Google Apps, only to find out that users were not satisfied one way or another. Quoting a CIO at Chicago State University, "it's a huge effort to ask people to learn something different - even if it's for a better price point." In the end, this is where the plan to cut costs can turn into an investment nightmare.

Interface. If you juggle an Exchange account for work and Google account for personal information, you'll know the interfaces are quite unique. While Exchange is specifically garnered for the "sophisticated" enterprise individual, Google Apps has been advancing to support a more enterprise-friendly experience. One of the noted Business Google Apps that users felt lacked was the group calendaring, although Google disputes it. Nonetheless, is your Exchange set up to provide maximum efficiency from individuals as well as groups? (Google Wave is an example of combining interface with a designed purpose - group collaboration.)

Components. What exact pieces do you need to run your business? Exchange offers e-mail, contacts, calendar, and instant messaging, while adding services like SharePoint, Office Live, and Office Online at extra costs. Google provides Gmail for Business, Google Docs, Calendar, Groups, Sites and Video, and several chat and instant messaging tools. The platform may be important, but it's the tools that inevitably make you more or less efficient every day, and these needs will vary among small businesses.

 

Before you jump ship for what seems like a "cheaper" solution, make sure to evaluate your current infrastructure and educate yourself with the off-premise service. It may be a costly process if you don't understand your company's present and future needs.

 

Until next time -

Matthew Hymel

 

Switchfast Technologies
Chicago IT Support & Consulting
Rochester IT Support & Consulting

Related posts

1 comment(s) for “Gmail vs. Exchange – Will Cloud Services Cut Costs?”
  1. Rebecca says:
    Nice post, very thorough. In the end there is no "one size fits all" solution as far as what is best. Each company has to weigh out what their needs are and find the solution that works best for them.

Leave comment:

Name:  
Email:  
Website:
Comment:  




Archives